Difference between revisions of "Philosopedia:General disclaimer"

From Philosopedia
Jump to navigationJump to search
Line 3: Line 3:
 
Users, who likely are well acquainted with the school of skepticism, will of necessity approach all materials herein by asking if what they are reading is logical and factual.  Listings, however, will attempt to document facts and jugments presented in a neutral and disinterested manner, citing works and authors.  Nevertheless, opposing viewpoints to any listings are invited in order to keep the encyclopedia balanced.
 
Users, who likely are well acquainted with the school of skepticism, will of necessity approach all materials herein by asking if what they are reading is logical and factual.  Listings, however, will attempt to document facts and jugments presented in a neutral and disinterested manner, citing works and authors.  Nevertheless, opposing viewpoints to any listings are invited in order to keep the encyclopedia balanced.
  
Skeptics are aware that absolute knowledge is not possible. Anyone with a philosophically oriented outlook starts by doubting what is said or heard or read or seen. Using a process of trial and error, the doubting leads to a relative certainty.   
+
Skeptics are aware that absolute knowledge is not possible. Anyone with a philosophically-oriented outlook starts by doubting what is said or heard or read or seen. Using a process of trial and error, the doubting leads to a relative certainty.   
  
 
Therefore, be aware that whatever is included in Philosopedia needs to be approached with serious dubiety.  
 
Therefore, be aware that whatever is included in Philosopedia needs to be approached with serious dubiety.  

Revision as of 17:55, 27 December 2005

Philosopedia, like Wikipedia, is an online open-content collaborative encyclopedia.

Users, who likely are well acquainted with the school of skepticism, will of necessity approach all materials herein by asking if what they are reading is logical and factual. Listings, however, will attempt to document facts and jugments presented in a neutral and disinterested manner, citing works and authors. Nevertheless, opposing viewpoints to any listings are invited in order to keep the encyclopedia balanced.

Skeptics are aware that absolute knowledge is not possible. Anyone with a philosophically-oriented outlook starts by doubting what is said or heard or read or seen. Using a process of trial and error, the doubting leads to a relative certainty.

Therefore, be aware that whatever is included in Philosopedia needs to be approached with serious dubiety.

On the subject of doubt:

* The believer is happy; the doubter is wise. - Hungarian Proverb
* To doubt is to elevate one's soul. Not to doubt is a sign of ignorance. - Epicurus"' (503 - 571 B.C.E.
* Speak what you think now in hard words, and tomorrow speak what tomorrow you think in hard words again, though it contradict everything you have said today. - Ralph Waldo Emerson
* Men become civilized, not in proportion to their willingness to believe, but in proportion to their readiness to doubt. - H. L. Mencken
* To believe is very dull. To doubt is intensely engrossing. To be on the alert is to live. To be lulled into security is to die - Oscar Wilde
* To know thing down, especially if it is cocked at an arrogant angle, is a deep delight of the blood. - George Santayana.

To illustrate, have you been able to tell which one of the above six quotations is a fabrication?